Ideas associated with “climate compensation” (e.g., planting trees, trading emission rates or supporting green projects to compensate for environmentally harmful behavior) can hence be found in the context of both local and global decision making.
#SPLITTING STACKS IN ECO GLOBAL SURVIVAL LICENSE#
Although interventions in developing countries create some climate gains from the system, the system may also license irresponsible behavior for people prepared to pay for it. Companies, private persons, and even nations, trade carbon offsets within the European Union Emission Trading Scheme, whereby they compensate emission rates with financial means.
Entire economic systems have been built on the same principle. They might purchase some extra groceries because the groceries are “eco-labeled” think that they can justify taking the airplane abroad for vacation because they have been taking the bicycle to work and think that they can skip recycling their waste because they started having meat-free Mondays. When people try to act in environmentally friendly ways, they often in fact do further harm to the environment. The environmental impact of one’s own behavior is difficult to grasp, partly because issues related to climate change are perceived as psychologically distant (cf. Strategies for handling problems caused by this cognitive insufficiency are discussed. “Eco-guilt” from imbalance in the moral environmental account may promote pro-environmental acts, but also acts that are seemingly pro-environmental but in reality more harmful than doing nothing at all. This balancing heuristic leads to compensatory green beliefs and negative footprint illusions-the misconceptions that “green” choices can compensate for unsustainable ones. When the same reasoning is applied to environment-related behaviors, people tend to think in terms of a balance between “environmentally friendly” and “harmful” behaviors, and to morally account for the average of these components rather than the sum. Reciprocity and balance in social relations have been fundamental to social cooperation, and thus to survival, and therefore the human brain has become specialized by natural selection to compute and seek this balance. This paper argues that one reason behind why people do this is that people apply heuristics, originally shaped to handle social exchange, on the issues of environmental impact.
Standing Torch: 6 minutes, 40 seconds per unitįull list of items crafted with Wood Gathering Wood.